La Porte Baseball Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331663495
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- La Porte, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2814707275
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,808
- Expenses
- $506
- Assets
- $72,302
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN BAILEY (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC STANLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN BAILEY (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC STANLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LISA GARCIA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The la porte baseball association is a youth baseball organization where the youth in our community and surrounding communities are able to participate in competitive baseball games with divisions including 4 and under up to 18 and under. Lpba runs both a spring and fall youth baseball season at pecan park located at 3600 canada dr. In la porte, tx. The baseball league is funded by registration fees for each youth that plays in our league and 100 percent of our funding is put back into the league through field maintenance costs, umpires, baseballs, gear, ect.
What it reported doing in 2024
The association received $50,000 in tournament field rental fees for the league at the end of december 2024. No expenses have been incurred as the tournament event will not take place until 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 59.3%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 99.3%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 142.89; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 59.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $300 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.