La Plata Family Centers Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840988973
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Durango, CO, USA
Phone
9703854747
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,053,956
Expenses
$851,102
Assets
$1,088,232
Liabilities
$68,783

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL WANGER (President)
  • KELLY VON STROH (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARIEL BALBUENA (Executive Dir.): $68,019 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the organization is: through education, resource networking andpositive relationship building, we form respectful, productive family partnershipsthat create thriving, empowered individuals who are self-reliant and who envision ahopeful future for themselves, their families and their communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community led response initiatives/ iniciativas de respuesta lideradas por lacomunidad together we grow/juntos crecemos as the result of a participatory processwith community members, volunteers, partnering organizations, lpfcc's staff, board of directors and experts, together we grow/juntos crecemos was created as a newcommunity-led initiative to put to work existing infrastructure to build a local, sustainable food economy, grow economic mobility and encourage pride inmultigenerational cultural heritage, thanks to a grant from the Colorado healthfoundation. Lpfcc has successfully implemented year three of this initiative and isready to continue the efforts thanks to additional funding primarily from thecolorado health foundation. Key parent-leaders from the community who have been central in defining community suggestions for this project have up to 13 years ofexperience through the "giving garden" initiative, growing in season, post-harvestvegetable, distribution, tracking and in organizing sustained community involvement.we are also supported by a local farmer-advisor with successful, diverse, vegetableproduction. Activities will be conducted by community members and overseen andsupported behind the scenes by lpfc and project volunteer, staff in a manner thatupholds the expertise and power of community participants. Progress will be overseenby the lpfcc executive director under the guidance of the board of directors and thecommunity at large. The Colorado fatherhood program (cfp) - this is a five-yearcontract with office of early childhood to facilitate cfp, a family-centeredcomprehensive case management program. It provides connections to community-basedservices and supports in the areas of healthy relationships, responsible parenting, economic stability and building social capital for all fathers in the communitywhere the fatherhood program is delivered. Targeted outreach includes fathers(biological, expectant, adoptive, stepfathers, foster, kinship, and grandfathers)over 18 years, with children or caring for children up to age 24 years. This programis expected to serve a minimum of 35 fathers. Through the membership with the familyresource center association, la plata family centers coalition has opportunities tostrengthen existing programs. The family resource center association's family support services framework used by lpfcc outlines three distinct paths of support and associated assessments and data tracking. This framework includes the coloradofamily support assessment 2.0 (cfsa2) and ensures best practices are consistentlyfollowed throughout service delivery. Lpfcc also utilizes the quality standards forfamily strengthening & support, issued by the California network of familystrengthening networks and adopted by the national network of family support andstrengthening networks, as a tool for ensuring that families are supported and strengthened through quality practice. These standards integrate and operationalizethe principles of family support practice with the strengthening families approachand its research-based, evidence-informed five protective factors. In addition toproviding training and technical support, the family resource center associationacts as a pass through for funding from other foundations such as delta dental andcdphe. According to the lpfcc annual report for 2023-2024, lpfcc provided 37,702services including program support, concrete resources, and financial assistance to650 unduplicated families and 1,530 unduplicated individuals from differentsocioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. During the growing and harvesting season, lpfcc's pond farm and four satellite gardens produced 15,000 lbs. Of fresh organicproduce. This supplied families, individuals and partnering agencies such as fourthe children, escalante reading club and la escuelita at the four corners immigrantresource center compaeros. The lpfcc's emergency food pantry was accessed 6,500 times during this reporting period. Support cont

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.6%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 85.8%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $53.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.6% of revenue deployed · 85.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $730K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.