La Limye' Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474043586
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Collierville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9012403865
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $588,118
- Expenses
- $422,307
- Assets
- $2,285,129
- Liabilities
- $-8,626
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELLEN HUMERICKHOUSE (PRESIDENT)
- PHILLIP BLUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ELLEN HUMERICKHOUSE (PRESIDENT)
- ANTHONY PERRY (SECRETARY)
- PHILLIP BLUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to clothe, feed, raise and educate haitian orphans who will be in our care.
What it reported doing in 2025
La limye ministries operates its primary mission in a very poor section of arcahaie, haiti, known as guiton, which has almost no government services. Through ellen humerickhouse and the la limye board's efforts over the past 9 years, la limye has raised funding to purchase land and build a secure complex with a building to house up to 15 girls, a water well and tower serving la limye's residents and local people in the village. A community pavilion whic is used for various community outreach functions including teaching english classes and the gospel to local adults, bible classes for the village children and various other assemblies. In 2019, la limye opened a special needs school to serve the needs of approximately 30-40 special needs children in the village, who are not allowed to attend local schools. La limye provides 20-30 jobs in an impoverished community in deperate need of them. This has allowed multiple families to support their children who otherwise had no hope, and also helped the community at large. In 2023, gang activity impacted the mission's ability to delivery many of the above services, but we continue to provide fresh water and limited food support to the village, along with school tuition and transportation when the schools are open. In april 2023, we temporarily moved our 10 resident orphan girls, our missionary ellen humerickhouse and two employees to cap haitien in the north of haiti where conditions were safer while we await security conditions in arcahaie/guiton to improve. We may establist a second mission in cap haitien to provide servies to the local community if this temporary relocation becomes permanent.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.9%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $11,517.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.41; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.9% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $303K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.