La Leche League of the United States of America Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270994576
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6098836265
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,169
- Expenses
- $55,105
- Assets
- $313,628
- Liabilities
- $1,122
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VERONIQUE LESOINNE (PRESIDENT)
- MISTY DUNN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VERONIQUE LESOINNE (PRESIDENT)
- MISTY DUNN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANN DAVIS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
La leche league USA helps parents, families, and communities to breastfeed, chestfeed, and human milk feed their babies through parent-to-parent support. Lll USA encourages, informs, educates, supports, and promotes the use of human milk and the intimate relationship and development that comes from nursing a child as long as mutually desired.
What it reported doing in 2025
Educational blog - weekly issues are produced and a digitalcopy is provided free of charge to more than 12,000 members and subscribers.this publication provides education and support for breastfeeding families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 68.2%; rating input score 68
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.8%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.69; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 68.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.