La County Library Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953766899
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Downey, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5629404189
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $479,609
- Expenses
- $444,801
- Assets
- $476,104
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREA CARROLL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREA CARROLL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $162,852 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2024
La county library foundation provided funding for la county library programs and locations, and also conducted educational outreach and awareness building about library programs and resources.in another turbulent year, la county library shone bright - a cornerstone of the community - providing tangible resources, trustworthy information, a safe place, and hope.la county library foundation, with its generous donors, were part of that - supporting programs and services to meet the unique needs of individuals and communities served by 86 libraries stretching across more than 3,000 square miles.support from the library foundation made a difference:- encouraging literacy and battling isolation with the library's summer discovery program to engage all ages - from babies and toddlers to older adults - in reading, programs, and using library resources. Exploring nature throughout the county with virtual science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (steam) programming, and hands-on exploration kits- promoting cultural understanding and inclusion- supporting students and developing lifelong learners with books, ebooks, and audiobooks, and opportunities for creating art and experiencing music- engaging young people and their families with the library via outreach with a my brother's peer advocate at carson library- engaging more people in using and supporting library programming, resources, and services - free and welcoming to all.- promoting the freedom to read, including with books unbanned, to provide any teen anywhere in California with free access to the entire library collection of ebooks and e-audiobooks, and to add to the library's collection.-uniting la county with one book, one county a county-wide read of "la weather" by maria amparo escandon with literacy activities, a festival, and author talk.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.6% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $342K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.