La Clinica Tepeyac
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841285505
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7202742923
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,089,181
- Expenses
- $18,759,847
- Assets
- $16,956,844
- Liabilities
- $5,978,383
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JIM GARCIA (CEO)
- DR HARVEY BOGRAD MD (PRESIDENT)
- CAROLINE ACHA (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR PAMELA VALENZA MD (CHO): $231,308 total reported compensation
- DR DANIEL WELLS-PRADO MD (PHYSICIAN): $206,871 total reported compensation
- JONATHAN CANO (DENTAL DIRECTOR): $176,489 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Inspire health, wellbeing, and humanity in our community, through all of life's stages. We envision a healthy community with access to regular and ongoing health care. As we expand our reach and bring,(continued on schedule o)cultural responsiveness into the community we strive for exceptional, trustworthy care that empowers our patients, decreases routine visits to emergency rooms, and creates healthier families overall.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tepeyac community health center provides team-based, affordable medical, behavioral health, dental, and pharmacy services for families in the community. Most clinical staff are bicultural and bilingual, and all direct-service providers are proficient or fluent in both spanish and english. Since 1995, tepeyac has served the community with accessible, culturally responsive care.clinic: tepeyac offers comprehensive primary care services, wellness and physical exams, behavioral health, and health education. This includes women's health exams, mammography, prenatal care, immunizations, school physicals, diabetes management, colposcopiess, preventive health education, (continued on schedule o) wellness classes, and oral health care.health promotion: provides education for the latinx community and their families to reduce the risk of chronic disease through community outreach and preventive health education conducted by the promotoras de salud (health promoters).pharmacy: provides access to affordable medications and pharmaceutical counseling to support chronic disease management, preventive care, and general health needs, with a focus on improving medication adherence and health outcomes for underserved populations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 64% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $231K · 20 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $740K reported
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.