La'akea Village

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990348754
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Paia, HI, USA
Phone
8085798398
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,060,824
Expenses
$873,646
Assets
$1,460,478
Liabilities
$32,255

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN GRAHAM (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ASHLEE KLEMPERER (EXECUTIVE DI): $54,487 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The la'akea village is a place where adults with developmental disabilities can go to live, learn, and work with others in an atmosphere of care and respect.

What it reported doing in 2024

Day treatment program: covid and the doh rules that were put into effect significantly altered our approach to providing services. Prior to march 2020, the campus was considered a community hub where participants and mentors gathered in morning circle, a community and communal lunch was served every day, the country store was open and many activities took place. All of this quickly took a pivot to limit potential exposure for this vulnerable population. We had to find ways for our participants to continue to touch and feel the inclusive, life sharing setting where they engage in a healthy productive lifestyle. With the help of zoom, the participants continued to connect for morning circle, zumba, hula, fitness, non-violent communication and numerous other classes. Our agricultural activities continued to thrive as participants and mentors scheduled times to come onto campus in pairs. As the pandemic subsided and protocols of isolation were revised, we began to again hold full 5 day per week day program activities beginning in august 2022. Participants are again meeting on campus daily, joining in morning circle, discussing the various options to contribute to the la'akea community such as garden and farm harvesting of produce (papayas, eggs, avocados, star fruit, ulu leaves, oregano, lemon grass are just some of the products we grow and sell). We have been able to reinstate our monthly community activity calendar as well and each week we go into the community to participate in various events such as surfing, volunteering at maui humane society, starlight farms volunteering. On campus we also hold weekly community events such as yoga, jewelry making and non-violent communication circle. We have recently upgraded our data and goal tracking capabilities with a software program, therap. This program has the capabilities for mentors to log data in real time through their smartphone. Even the anecdotal stories can be recorded. All of this is resulting in increased data collection. Funding from medicaid waiver subjects la'akea to rigorous and thorough annual audits by the department of health. Although meeting compliance standards is not our end goal, we view clean audits and successful re- certifications as critical confirmation of our ability to serve the safety and well-being of our participants. The country store is considered a part of program rather than a retail endeavor and been subject to strict safety rules. This has been a key location for many skill building and community interaction activities. The pandemic necessitated a pivot to producing a subscription-based weekly csa produce box distributed in the community. Participants were involved in harvesting and producing the boxes. For example, kat, one of participants, picked and packed the produce box to bring home to her father who was one of our first csa members. The "store" was able to move outside under the fresh pa'ia air for a weekly farmers market and participants are involved in all aspects including the harvesting, preparing, selling and engagement with the community. In november, 2022 we were finally able to re-open the country store here at la'akea village so that participants would again learn retail skills of running a small business in addition to interacting with the public. Our community lunch and food production program out of the kitchen was shifted for the beginning portion of the year. Initially we did have small groups of 2-4 people back in the kitchen to continue their skills training. For example, abby, one of our participants, recently received her safe food handling certificate. She is practicing safety, hygiene, and cleaning routines in the campus kitchen with her mentor to prepare small scale meals. We have been able to re-introduce volunteer lunch once a week with many participants who work to help prepare the lunch for all. When we are fully staffed and at participant capacity we will be able to again prepare and eat lunch daily.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 60.4%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $74.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.67; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50% of revenue deployed · 60.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $528K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.