L I Zoological Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112677690
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Manorville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6318781785
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Zoo, Zoological Society
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $719,783
- Expenses
- $610,625
- Assets
- $2,295,711
- Liabilities
- $22,685
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN ALBACH (PRESIDENT)
- KELSEY ALBACH (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN ALBACH (PRESIDENT): $67,692 total reported compensation
- KELSEY ALBACH (VICE PRESIDENT): $43,584 total reported compensation
- KIRSTEN ALBACH (DIRECTOR): $41,611 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational animal farm
What it reported doing in 2025
Operation of animal farm
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.5%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.76; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $611K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.