Kyrene De Las Brisas Ptso
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860773241
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Chandler, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 0000000000
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,485
- Expenses
- $44,760
- Assets
- $100,614
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jennifer Whitesides (Co-President)
- Katie Koshick (Co-President)
- Megan Villalpando (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jennifer Whitesides (Co-President)
- Katie Koshick (Co-President)
- Megan Villalpando (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist Brisas staff in their efforts to continually improve education health and safety of all students
What it reported doing in 2024
Sponsored school-based clubs and Enrichment Activities Mallet Masters grades 4 and 5 performs for school events Art Masterpiece for all grade levels promote art literacy Spark Club and Student Council grades 3-5 for student leadership Cheerleading grades 3-5 performs for school events Teachers leading clubs are provided with a stipend from PTSO Field trip costs and transportation fees are subsidized from PTSO contributions to each grade
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.2%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.25; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -39.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.2% of revenue deployed · 0.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $41 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.