Kyle Swanson Legacy Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882684230
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, US
- Phone
- (513) 231-1036
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $166,112
- Expenses
- $38,703
- Assets
- $452,598
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Paul Swanson (President)
People named in this filing
- Ted Beach (Director)
- David Budig (Director)
- John Clark (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To nurture and enhance the development of children and young adults through participation in and enjoyment of sports; to comfort and aide those patients and families facing the daily challenges of cancer; to advocate and ensure the health, safety, and dignity of our animal friends.
What it reported doing in 2025
Donation of $3,500 to The Foster Dog House to support adoption for Dogs. Donation of $5,000 to the Reds Community Fund to support baseball inner cities. Donation of $10,000 to Cinti Grande Futbol Club to support Inner City Youth Soccer Club. Donation of $4,000 to Worth The Wait to support Fertility, Adoption and Surrogacy for Cancer Survivors. Donation of $4,000 to the Cancer Support Community of Greater Cincinnati to support Cancer Support to Cinti Families. Donation of $4,000 to Save the Animals Foundation to support Animal Rescue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26.4%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.7%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.69; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 26.4% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.