Kukuna O Ka La Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862297448
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cedar Park, TX, USA
Phone
5133304826
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$175,770
Expenses
$95,753
Assets
$203,217
Liabilities
$124

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CATHRYN YASHAR MD (CHAIRPERSON OF THE BOARD)
  • RON DIGIAIMO (TREASURER)
  • MARY RACINO (CORPORATE SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

From 990-ez, part iii, primary exempt purpose - kukuna-o-ka-la holds an annual radiation oncology conference. The conference is held to bring together professions in the radiation oncology section to provide education on the latest information that raditation oncologists need to stay at the top of thier filed and stay informed so that you can continue to provide patients with the lastest and best available care.

What it reported doing in 2025

Kukuna-o-ka-la holds an annual radition oncology conference. The conference is held to bring together professions in the radiation oncology section to provide education on the latest information that radiation oncologists need to stay at the top of thier filed and stay informed so that you can continue to provide patients with the latest and best avalable care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.5%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.