Krucial Rapid Response Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883345047
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lenexa, KS, USA
Phone
8882226359
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,434,367
Expenses
$19,243,015
Assets
$6,627,828
Liabilities
$4,892,286

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFERY HUFF (PART-YEAR PRESIDENT)
  • APRIL SCHIFFELBEIN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES)
  • MICHAEL VIETTI (VICE PRESIDENT OF MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION)
  • RICHARD HELT (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF PARTNER SOLUTIONS)
  • SCOTT OBERKROM (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • WENDY BOOTHE (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAKISHA SHIVERS (RN CLINICAL LIAISON): $306,707 total reported compensation
  • RICHARD HELT (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF PARTNER SOLUTIONS): $193,400 total reported compensation
  • APRIL SCHIFFELBEIN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES): $181,278 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide critical support with healthcare personnel & other resources to underresourced communities experiencing hardship/disruption in essential services or in emergency situations.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization's activities are conducted by a large pool of trained personnel whenever and wherever a need for help arises within the united states. These activities include:(1) assisting government agencies and other exempt organizations in their mission to provide relief at the local, state, and federal levels, providing rapid, high volume, emergency response deployment in disaster situations, and(2) relieving the stresses put on hospitals and other healthcare facilities by filling the gap in trained medical personnel and positively impacting the access to and quality of care patients in these communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 47
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -29.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -64.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 70.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $307K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $886K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.