Krishna Mandir Cultural Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201090079
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Baldwin, NY, USA
Phone
7186476776
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Affiliation
Hinduism

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,231
Expenses
$5,347
Assets
$3,589

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAJENDRA RAJCOOAR (President)
  • HEMWATIE RAJCOOAR (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • RAJENDRA RAJCOOAR (President)
  • HEMWATIE RAJCOOAR (Vice President)
  • NANCOOAR RAJCOOAR (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The sponsoring of programs that promote the understanding & appreciation of the Hindu culture & Religion, promote cultural discourse, celebrate Hindu traditions and festivals, provide information & instruction on the Hindu culture, and to provide a refuge for Hindus & non-Hindus in the form of counseling, personal development and referral networking.

What it reported doing in 2016

To sponsor programs to promote the understanding & appreciation of the Hindu culture & Religion, to Promote cultural discourse, clebrate Hindu traditions and festivals, provide information & instruction in the Hindu cutlture. Also to provide a refuge for Hindus & non-Hindus alike in the form of counseling, personal development and referral networking.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.6%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 36.8%; rating input score 37

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.6% of revenue deployed · 36.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.