Krewe De Tigris Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991966519
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Auburn, AL, USA
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,195
- Expenses
- $35,993
- Assets
- $154,244
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Hunter Garris (President)
- Nick Rusk (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Kaitlyn E Stiles CPA (Treasurer)
- Hunter Garris (President)
- Celeste Dorman (Web Master)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote community fellowship and cultural tradition through the organization of an annual social event (the Mardi Gras Ball), and to support charitable and civic causes in the Auburn-Opelika area through fundraising and community engagement.
What it reported doing in 2025
Float Storage Fundraiser Draw Down Event: The organization hosted a Draw Down Fundraiser to raise funds specifically for the secure storage of parade floats used in the annual Mardi Gras parade. The event included community participation prize drawings and donor engagement. Number of persons benefitted: approximately 150 participants and 5,000+ parade attendees indirectly benefitted through continuation of parade floats. Net proceeds: $8,298, Purpose: Sustain the long-term success of the Mardi Gras parade by funding float preservation and storage
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.9%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 59.1%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.29; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -53.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.9% of revenue deployed · 59.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.