Korean K9 Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814950261
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Long Is City, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3474660333
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $967,004
- Expenses
- $943,405
- Assets
- $447,253
- Liabilities
- $26,030
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gina Kim-Sadiku (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Gina Kim-Sadiku (President): $85,020 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Korean k9 rescue inc is a non-profit no-kill 501c3 dog rescue organization that saves dogs from the mea trade puppy mills and high-kill shelters in south korea. Due to the stigma associated with mixed breed and dog meat farm dogs most dogs have a low chance of being adopted in south korea. Korean k9 rescue inc transports these dogs to the united states and find loving forever homes for them. In the process korean k9 rescue inc is able to spread awareness about the brutal dog meat trade and be a voice for the voiceless dogs that are still suffering in the meat trade
What it reported doing in 2025
Program is established for the rehabilitation and adoption of rescued dogs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 49.8%; rating input score 50; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $870K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 46 of 46 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.