Korean Cultural Center Alaska
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843622823
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Anchorage, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9075615345
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,608
- Expenses
- $33,794
- Assets
- $123,355
- Liabilities
- $5,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Key Getty (President)
- Hye Jung (President)
- Sun Lee (Vice President)
- Rebecca Farrow (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Key Getty (President): $4,300 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Korean Cultural Center Alaska (KCCA) promotes sharing the cultural heritage of Korean and encouraging cross-cultural understanding through exchanging diverse cultural values to empower all people, build a bridge, and celebrate unity within our community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Worked with the community to plan, organize and hold multiple events to celebrate diversity and build unity in the City of Anchorage.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 67% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.2%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.65; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.2% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.