Korean American Autism Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
336624529
IRS 990-PF coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Fullerton, CA, USA
Phone
5209098018
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,314
Expenses
$18,297

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Korean American Autism Foundation is a nonprofit. Location: Fullerton, CA. EIN 336624529. Tax year 2025 Form 990-PF reports $9.3K revenue and $18.3K expenses.

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 4 grants totaling $6,000. The stated grant purposes included to support sa-rang community church's community service and outreach programs that provide assistance to local families and individuals in need., to support america wheat mission's community outreach and relief programs serving individuals and families in southern california., and to support the organization's charitable programs that strengthen underserved communities through education, outreach, and essential services., plus 1 other reported purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of available resources goes to charitable grants and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 42
  • Cost Efficiency: 33
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 95

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 41.9%; rating input score 42; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 32.8%; rating input score 33; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 48.5; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 41.9% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 95th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Grant Deployment: Grant deployment ratio scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 33/100.