Koppa Lab
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991365263
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 6463411699
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $402,153
- Expenses
- $209,140
- Assets
- $227,453
- Liabilities
- $34,440
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLY WIDELSKA (BOARD PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY WIDELSKA (BOARD PRESIDENT AND CEO): $41,091 total reported compensation
- JUSTUS EISFELD (BOARD TREASURER): $35,025 total reported compensation
- FABRICE HOUDART (BOARD MEMBER): $29,700 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Koppa labs mission is to improve the socio-economic well-being and development of lgbti+ people and their communities worldwide.
What it reported doing in 2024
Current: data and knowledge - we convened and connected stakeholders to improve the volume, quality and utilization of data to make a difference in lgbti+ communities lives. Successfully launched the global consortium for inclusive data (cid) in partnership with the un, bringing together over 40 experts to accelerate knowledge-sharing and data-collection efforts essential to driving inclusive economic development. Executed a major data program in belize to produce the nations first diagnostic on lgbti+ economic exclusion, establishing the foundation for a comprehensive inclusion agenda.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.1%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 56%; rating input score 56
- Fundraising efficiency: $39.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 56.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.1% of revenue deployed · 56% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $117K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.