Konocti Womens Service Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851270240
IRS 990-PF coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2024
Location
Kelseyville, CA, USA
Phone
7072770972
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,366
Expenses
$40,434

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Youth Community Service Clubs

What it reported funding in 2024

The foundation reported 23 filed grant rows totaling $23,516. The stated grant purposes included donation to assist the totes 4 teens foundation to provide needy teens with a large santa bag filled with: size appropriate sleeping bag to 20 degrees bed pillow with custom pillowcase fleece blanket beach towel winter parka insulated lunch box with ice pack supply of food items snacks peanut butter beef jerky etc. 502 c 3 tax id 35-2534764, lclc is a non-profit volunteer organization that supports the lake county library literacy program. reading program for childern and free books, and provided backpacks and clothes for children from elementary age to high school., plus 13 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filing identifies who received its grants and a large share of spending goes to grants. Assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
  • Cost Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 71
  • Endowment Health: 47

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: Limited

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 73%; rating input score 73; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: 8 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 42
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Missing
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Missing
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Missing
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Missing
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Missing
    • Payment to a government official: Missing
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Missing
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Missing
    • Excess business holdings: Missing
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Missing
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Missing
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Individual grants for travel, study or similar purposes: Pass
    • Grants outside qualifying charitable organization categories: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 0.87; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: Filed payout detail
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 47th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 47/100.