Konbit Sante Cap Haitien Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010540292
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Falmouth, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2072476733
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,064,592
- Expenses
- $927,615
- Assets
- $587,797
- Liabilities
- $176,513
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Perry Newman (Executive Director)
- Eva Lathrop (Board President)
Highest reported compensation
- Perry Newman (Executive Director): $87,975 total reported compensation
- Tezita Negussie (Country Director): $78,885 total reported compensation
- Marcella Felde (Operations Manager): $70,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to support the development of a sustainable health system to meet the needs of the Cap-Haitien community in Haiti with maximum local direction and support.
What it reported doing in 2024
Konbit Sante is a global health non-profit organization that supports the delivery of quality health services in northern Haiti. Founded in 2001, the organization strives to impact the building blocks, or essential functions, of a health system by working with partners to ensure that they have a well-trained workforce, reliable data, well-maintained facilities, access to essential medication, supplies, and equipment, adequate financing, and strong management practices. Konbit Sante believes that supporting the capacity of local health systems is the path to ensuring sustainable quality, accessible, and efficient health care for all.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 54
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.7%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.9%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.7% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $634K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.