Koman Family Foundation Fka Bill & Amy Koman Family Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
276982384
IRS 990-PF coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3148989900
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Private Grantmaking Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$799,000
Expenses
$69,908

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Private Grantmaking Foundations

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 4 filed grant rows totaling $43,237. The stated grant purposes included pedal the cause accelerates breakthrough cancer research at siteman cancer center and siteman kids at st. louis children's hospital by inspiring and mobilizing a community committed to curing cancer.2025 stock donation detail: date of contribution: 11/3/25shares contributed: 80 high/low value: $20,236.40cost basis value: $20,089.60, to change the culture of youth sports so that every child, regardless of social or economic circumstance, has access to a positive youth sports experience., and to foster networking, innovation, and industry impact for stanford alumni., plus 1 other reported purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of available resources goes to charitable grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 16
  • Cost Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 97

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 16; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 61.8%; rating input score 62; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Individual grants for travel, study or similar purposes: Pass
    • Grants outside qualifying charitable organization categories: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 82.09; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 15.9% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 97th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Grant Deployment: Grant deployment ratio scored 16/100.