Ko Olina Charities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450499264
IRS 990-PF coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2024
Location
Honolulu, HI, USA
Phone
8085319761
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,000
Expenses
$52,886

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Human Service Organizations

What it reported funding in 2024

The foundation reported 2 grants totaling $10,450. The stated grant purposes included to support community projects and/or community activities designed for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes, and to the benefit of the residents of the leeward coast of oahu. and ko olina charities collected contributions on behalf of ko olina resort operators association, inc for the 2024 annual ko olina children's festival event. funds raised by the ko olina children's festival is 100% donated to the kapiolani medical center for women & children, which is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit medical center in hawaii. ko olina resort operators association, inc contributed the funds received from ko olina charities directly to kapiolani medical center for women & children..

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The foundation carried out 80% of its reported charitable disbursements directly.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 100
  • Cost Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 96

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 19.8%; rating input score 20; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 70.66; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: At least 100% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 96th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 20/100.