Knights Youth Football and Cheer Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834699165
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Acton, MA, USA
Phone
3392216461
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,075
Expenses
$88,173
Assets
$42,806
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Matthew Pickett (President)
  • Aaron Jeanson (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Matthew Pickett (President)
  • Aaron Jeanson (Vice President)
  • David Goldstein (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote youth football and cheerleading in the communities of Westford, Acton, Boxborough and Littleton, MA

What it reported doing in 2025

In conjunction with American Youth Football organization, we help promote youth cheerleading and football for approximately 200 boys and girls in the Acton-Boxborough, Westford and Littleton, MA communities. Each fall season consists of approximately 100 hours of practice, 8-10 games, and 3-4 cheer competitions. In 2023, we had to make a large purchase of new football helmets because several of our helmets had gone past the expiration date of 10 years. We were able to increase our enrollment for both cheer and football from the previous year

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.7%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -59.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 33.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.