Knights of Columbus St Anthony Council No 13118

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900518040
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Phone
9548952429
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,158
Expenses
$31,986
Assets
$17,872
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Steve Roepke (Financial Secretary)
  • Andrew E Massagee II (Grand Knight)
  • Charles A Acevedo (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Knights of Columbus is a Catholic fraternal organiztion dedicated to strengthening faith, supporting families, and serving the community through charitale works and volunteerism. Our council provides a welcoming environment where members and their families grow in fellowship deepen their spiritual lives, and live out the principles of charity, unity, and fraternity. Through faith-based initiatives and community engagement, we strive to be a visible and active force for good, promoting compassion, integrity, and service to those in need.

What it reported doing in 2025

The council conducts a wide range of chritable, social, and faith-centered programs designed to benefit both members and the broader community. These include fundraising efforts that support local charities, parish initiatives, and individuals facing hardship; community events that foster fellowship and engagement; and service projects that address food insecurity, family support, and outreach to the vulnerable. Additionally, the council provides a gathering place where members and guests can participate in organized events, meals, and activities that strenghten community bonds while generating resources to sustain and expand our charitable mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 59% for direct work, 33% for grants, and 8% for affiliated organizations.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -100.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -70.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 176.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.