Knights of Columbus Fr Vincent S Sikora Counc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541199477
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Burke, VA, USA
Phone
7032830279
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,061
Expenses
$92,407
Assets
$94,920
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Vincent Augelli (Grand Deputy Knight)
  • Dave Zivith (Trustee 1)
  • Patrick Dellate (Trustee 2)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support Roman Catholic religious orders, seminarians, clergy, scholarships to Catholic elementary, middle and high schools and other religious groups. Support family programs with full range of scouting activities, Boys Clubs, Explorers, Eagle and Catholic youth groups. Direct assistance to multiple community outreach programs including Appalachia home build project. Support for programs assisting women during and after pregnancy. Direct assistance to persons with intellectual disabilities. Assistance to members in financial distress for mortgage, utilities and medical expenses. Per capita charges for the KOC Supreme HQ and State Councils of the Knights of Columbus. Operating Expenses and general program support from the Council.

What it reported doing in 2025

Direct assistance to multiple community outreach programs and to persons with intellectual disabilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 8 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.