Knights of Columbus

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237121507
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Coldwater, OH, USA
Phone
4198527594
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$96,751
Expenses
$84,356
Assets
$102,821
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Andrew Vickery (Recorder)
  • Mike Hoying (Grand Knight)
  • David Hemmelgarn (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support local religious shrine, Support local people to recover from strokes and head injuries, supporting people having trouble affording groceries, supporting the right to life of the unborn, supporting pregnant and young mother to be able to support their soon to be born children. We also support cancer patients with the expense of treatments, support the mentally disabled, and support our schools by offering scholarships, donations to school clubs and school groups, and supporting youth mentoring.

What it reported doing in 2025

Sweet Corn Project: We plant approximately 3 acres of sweet corn and donate the profits to six groups which serve the impoverished, the distressed and the youth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.4%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 4

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.8%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.4% of revenue deployed · 3.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.