Knights of Columbus 1169

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237109363
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Martinsburg, WV, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,443
Expenses
$38,317
Assets
$47,229

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Mike ODonnell (Trustee)
  • Mike Arndt (Trustee)
  • Melvin M Bowers Jr (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charitable organization which supports other local non-profit organizations. This support may be monetary or non-monetary food donations to CCAP Loaves & Fishes or active participation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Charitable Bingo direct expenses and donations to various 501 c 3 organizations. Donations: Marys Refuge Martinsburg $1,400 Martinsburg Little League $1,400 Martinsburg Ladies Fast Pitch Softball $1.400 Martinsburg Boys and Girls Club $1,400 Berkely County WV CCAP Loaves and Fishes $1,400 Special Olympics $1,400 Jump Jr Mentoring Program Martinsburg $500 St Joseph Church Martinsburg Social Concerns $500 St Bernedette Church Hedgesville Social Concerns $500 Catholic Charities Martinsburg $500 St Joseph Church Martinsburg World Missions $200 St Vincent Depaul Martinsburg $500 St. John Bosco Childrens Fund Martinsburg $800 Martinsburg Girls Softball League $300 St Joseph Church Martinsburg $750 Marys Refuge $2,000. Total donations $14,950Expenses $2,299. Total $17,249

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 62.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.