Knights for Good Works

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262989903
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Maumelle, AR, USA
Phone
5017650146
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,663
Expenses
$9,288
Assets
$407,266
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK SPRINGER (PRESIDENT)
  • PETER STABNICK (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ALAN CARLSON (DIRECTOR)
  • GEORGE VIRDEN (DIRECTOR)
  • KENNEY PETTY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The knights for good works will support the catholic church at the state and local level by conducting activities consistent with the catholic church itself, and its affiliated organizations. The planned activities of the knights for good works include the following:(a) annual cash gifts to catholic churches and catholic charities;(b) purchase and prepare meals for local catholic parishes;(c) activities and financial aide for youth, such as financial gifts toschools for children with disabilities and organizations supportingvictims of domestic violence;(d) provide gifts to organizations that provide food to the hungry andother essential items to the poor in central Arkansas.(e) provide food and services to victims of natural disasters, such asstorm victims, and fans for the poor during the summer.

What it reported doing in 2024

See description provided in schedule o for part iii, primary exempt purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.9%; rating input score 39
  • Program expense ratio: 53.8%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 43.85; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -59.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -81.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38.9% of revenue deployed · 53.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.