Klingberg Comprehensive Program Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
060688316
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
New Britain, CT, USA
Phone
8602249113
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,035,523
Expenses
$15,223,641
Assets
$60,660,689
Liabilities
$2,776,182

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN A GIRELLI PHD (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • TERESA ALAIMO (VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE AND ADMIN)
  • SONIA COLON (VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS)
  • KARA PRESTON (VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT)
  • MARK JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDENT EMERITUS)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEPHEN A GIRELLI PHD (PRESIDENT/CEO): $221,538 total reported compensation
  • MARIANNE WUDARSKY (PYSCHIATRIST): $180,304 total reported compensation
  • TERESA ALAIMO (VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE AND ADMIN): $163,873 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide services to children and young adults, including residential care for children with complex health needs, education services, and therapeutic counseling throughout Connecticut.

What it reported doing in 2024

Webster house: webster house provides a caring and supportive environment for boys and girls ages 12 - 21 who struggle with behavioral health issues and co-occurring complex physical health needs. Their behavioral and medical health can be treated as part of an integrated care system. Working collaboratively with the young person's family or other permanency resource, our goal is the successful transition from our youth home to their families, to another permanency resource, or their next step towards independence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.98; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $222K · 18 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $629K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.