Kiwanis of Fabulous Fond Du Lac
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237351031
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Fond Du Lac, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9206026105
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,297
- Expenses
- $53,600
- Assets
- $64,053
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE MILLIN (PRESIDENT)
- MITCH GOEGLEIN (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- STEVE MILLIN (PRESIDENT)
- MITCH GOEGLEIN (PRESIDENT EL)
- BONNIE BAERWALD (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This organization is organized exclusively to provide monetary donations to charitable organizations that primarily serve the youth and families of the community. The club is a snapshot of the fond du lac community whose membership includes community leaders, business persons, and friends seeking a means to make a difference through community service. We make our service to fond du lac our main priority as we also enjoy growing friendship and community within the group. Members of the club are unified in the belief that the children and the community benefit from the efforts of volunteer groups with a passion for service. And, with this in mind, we purpose to become an outstanding service organization dedicated to the meet the growing needs of fond du lac and the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community services - special committee board designated funds, kiwanis international and other selected charities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.5% of revenue deployed · 73.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.