Kiwanis International Kiwanis Club of Lapeer 02468

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
386089322
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lapeer, MI, USA
Phone
8107936894
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,909
Expenses
$127,929
Assets
$21,337

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAMMY LYERLA (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC CATTANE (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • TAMMY LYERLA (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIC CATTANE (PRESIDENT EL)
  • ROB SKOUSON (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The kiwanis mission. Kiwanis is a global organization of volunteers dedicated to improving the world one child and one community at a time. The kiwanis vision. Kiwanis will be a positive influence in communities worldwide so that one day, all children will wake up in communities that believe in them, nurture them and provide the support they need to thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

Statement of program service accomplishments community service activities disbursements Michigan christian youth camp 1674 lapeer district library-reading program 1000 fantasy forrest 348 family literacy center 1500 kiwanis of Michigan foundation 1890 kiwanis intern'l foundation-children fd 365 lapeer kiwanis key club 850 children's advocacy center 1500 light up lapeer 500 young marines 1000 wandries wishes-easter program 200 4-h auction donation 103 _____ total community service form 990ez, part iii-line 30a 10,930

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 75% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -33.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $97K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.