Kiwanis International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680086351
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,568
Expenses
$107,861
Assets
$313,335
Liabilities
$3,627

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brenda Frachiseur (President)
  • John Prock (President Elect)

People named in this filing

  • Brenda Frachiseur (President)
  • John Prock (President Elect)
  • Tom Hinshaw (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our organization prioritizes community service with a strong focus on youth engagement. Through a variety of programs and initiatives we aim to empower young individuals to become active participants in their communities. By providing opportunities for leadership development skill-building and civic engagement we foster a sense of responsibility and social awareness among the next generation. Our efforts are dedicated to creating a positive impact on both the youth involved and the communities they serve.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community Service including Food Baskets for Food insecure families support of the Kiwanis Family House in Sacramento support of training to deter human trafficking childrens fund disaster relief Library Fishing Derby Easter Egg Hunt and MORE

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.9; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.