Kiwanis International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371107279
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Decatur, IL, USA
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,957
Expenses
$56,598
Assets
$76,668

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tom McQuistion (President)
  • Richard Virgin (President Elect)
  • Harold Wilkinson (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Tom McQuistion (President)
  • Richard Virgin (President Elect)
  • Lynda Durnil (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community Service -- specifically projects benefiting children. Kiwanis is an international group of volunteers dedicated to changing the world one child and one community at a time. As a group such persons can achieve what individuals cannot do alone. Thus our motto is We serve the children of the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Teddy Bear Dental Health Fund. Our grant pays for dental work for underprivileged children in Jergers Pediatric Dental Clinic in Decatur IL. Many of whom have severe dental problems such that our $5000 grant may only benefit up to 15 children. The dentists at the clinic themselves donate one day of free dental work for children per year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 64% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 25
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.4%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -122.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.