Kiwanis Club of Sanford, Maine
Legal name: Kiwanis Foundation of Sanford Maine
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010508198
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Sanford, Maine, US
- Phone
- 2073245357
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,469
- Expenses
- $33,922
- Assets
- $318,090
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Adam Pelletier (Immediate Past President)
- Nix Roux (President)
- Penny Wentworth (President Elect)
- Andrea Knight (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Krista Pelletier (Treasurer)
- Adam Pelletier (Immediate Past President)
- David Ferguson (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Serving Children In Our Community and Around The World Since 1923
What it reported doing in 2024
Various community assisted programs benefiting youth and disadvantage adults
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 87% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.4%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.5%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.38; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 29.4% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.