Kiwanis Foundation of Morgantown Wv Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550703499
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
Phone
3042929469
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,589
Expenses
$3,659
Assets
$251,924

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES F ALEXANDER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ARTHUS HAHN (TREASURER)
  • KARL YAGLE (SECRETARY)
  • ROBERT CLONCH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary mission of the kiwanis foundation of morgantown, wv, inc. Is to assist in funding morgantown kiwanis projects, which are: for the care, treatment and rehabilitation of crippled or otherwise handicapped persons, particularly children; to furnish funds to schools, hospitals, or other institutions or individuals associations or groups for the care, treatment, education and support of such persons and for the purpose of research into such care, treatment and education, to furnish to sich crippled or otherwise handicapped persons such AIDS and appliances as may otherwise handicapped persons such AIDS and appliances as may be necessary or advisable to assist them in carrying out their activities. For the conduct of sports, hobbies and other activities among children and young people. For combatting juvenile delinquency and use of drugs and drug addiction. For providing elderly and handicapped families on a non-profit basis rental housing and related facilities. And for providing

What it reported doing in 2024

The support of youth and elderly programs in accordance with its articles and bylaws.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 68.85; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.