Kiwanis Club of Vidalia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
586049712
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Vidalia, GA, USA
Phone
9125381275
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$97,319
Expenses
$96,118
Assets
$267,018

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREEM OWENS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FREDDY THOMPSON (DIRECTOR)
  • GREG MCKENZIE JR (OFFICER)
  • DENNIS DONAHUE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our local service club is affiliated with kiwanis international whose defining statement is "a global organization of volunteers dedicated to changing the world one child and one community at a time." our current motto is "serving the children of the world."

What it reported doing in 2024

These are not really grants, but rather contributions to community organizations. The primary emphasis is on children, but contributions to various organizations are not limited to children. Contributions throughout the year have been made to the boys and girls club, the local library to help sponsor a children's summer program, special olympics, the high school choral program, children's miracle network, tomorrow's leaders, future farmers of america, infant birth education program, united way, and support for the area schools. We also sponsor the local boy scout program and administer eight scholarships each year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.8%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.78; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.