Kiwanis Club of Seward Nebraska Kiwanis International Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 476040492
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Seward, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4026437747
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Men's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,499
- Expenses
- $91,740
- Assets
- $36,583
- Liabilities
- $8,052
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EARL PIERCE (PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE MEYER (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- EARL PIERCE (PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE MEYER (PRESIDENT EL)
- KIERRA BENNETT (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Kiwanis is part of a global organization of volunteers dedicated to improving the world one child and one community at a time.
What it reported doing in 2024
Kiwanis provides hats, coats, boots, books, and christmas gifts to the headstart organization in seward.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 78% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 24.9%; rating input score 25
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29% of revenue deployed · 24.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.