Kiwanis Club of London Ohio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
316049225
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
London, OH, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,992
Expenses
$21,110
Assets
$251,941

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stephanie Mack (President)

People named in this filing

  • Stephanie Mack (President)
  • Aaron Dwyer (Club Secretary)
  • Zahid Siddiqi (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Make a difference in our community by donating time money and effort to support mainly youth and related groups. Young children are priority one. As a local club we try to focus on local needs as much as possible.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hope 4 Holidays donation for toys for underprivileged children $1,500.00 Halloween Candy for LPD to hand out $254.00 Phat Daddys donation for thanksgiving dinners $1,000.00 London Girls Fastpitch Softball donation $500.00 LHS Arts Council donation $250.00 Junior Achievement donation $500.00 Junior Kiwanians meals and awards for LHS and MPHS Juniors $1,433.00 Donation to London Fire Dept for fire safety program $300.00 Madison Plains Scholastic Boosters donation $500.00 Backpacks with school supplies to Help House $3,014.00 Big Red Touchdown Club for LHS football program donation $500.00 Madison Health Foundation donation $500.00 Madison County Arts Council $1,000.00 Donation to Madison County Board of Develpmental Disabilities $400.00

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 91% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.93; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.