Kitsap Residences
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911254420
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Port Orchard, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3608761470
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,864,719
- Expenses
- $4,769,058
- Assets
- $1,934,336
- Liabilities
- $451,749
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS WALL (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- SHARON L STIFFEY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHERINE HOSKINS (Program Coordinator): $121,738 total reported compensation
- JULIET F SNAY (Accountant): $118,604 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER CARTER (SUPERVISOR): $110,855 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides twenty-four hours per day Instructions and Support Services to include Indirect Client Administrative Services to persons with Intellectual Challenges who are referred to us and under contract with Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Developmental Disabilities Administration.
What it reported doing in 2025
INSTRUCTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: Provided opportunities for self-determination and positive learning experiences through normative means. Provided the means to direct and participate in programs to the fullest extent of the person's abilities with intellectual challenges. Services included optimizing personal growth and the acquisition of those life skills that will enable persons to cope more effectively with their personal needs and the demands of their social environment. Provided a home-like setting where the best effort of staff, the program structure, and social atmosphere nurture a feeling of worth and self-acceptance. A written long-range goals and Individual Instruction and Support Plan were created for each person. The program will be reassessed to reflect the progress of the person in attaining each objective and how the goals was attained. Community resources will be utilized for their medical needs. Staff will facilitates social relationship with the non-intellectually challenged member of the community between people and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.