Kitsap Community Resources

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
910791411
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bremerton, WA, USA
Phone
3604732002
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,850,914
Expenses
$20,443,904
Assets
$30,781,745
Liabilities
$18,944,850

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELAINE WILLIAMS BRYANT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CAROLYNN PERKINS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELAINE WILLIAMS BRYANT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NATALIE LOGUE (DIRECTOR)
  • CHAD ENRIGHT (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Kitsap community resources is committed to creating hope and opportunity for low-income kitsap county residents by providing resources that promote self-sufficiency.

What it reported doing in 2024

Housing and community support division: energy and weatherization - served households and the utility cost savings is an average of 35%. Clients with asthma have shared they are experiencing a decrease in medicine use and hospital visits. Provided financial assistance with utility bills for low-income kitsap clients.housing and homeless - provided residents with services such as rental assistance, rapid re-housing, emergency shelter, transitional housing, case management and homeless childcare. Clients received transportation assistance. During covid, kcr was the main provider in providing assistance throughout the community for rental, energy and housing assistance with erap, trap and keda funding.kinship caregivers - provided financial assistance to grandparents and relatives raising children by assisting them to obtain resources to help stabilize the family. Emergent needs includes clothing purchases, food, childcare referral, and relocation costs.veterans assistance - provided financial assistance and guidance to veterans in need on behalf of kitsap county and the local veterans advisory board. Vets received assistance with food, utilities, medical bills, car repairs and funeral costs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $89.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $367K reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.