Kisoro Children's Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811525008
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Cambridge, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6172703147
- Rating
- 97
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Special Olympics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,724
- Expenses
- $176,009
- Assets
- $153,531
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELLEN WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CELESTE ROBB-NICHOLSON (DIRECTOR)
- DAVID GREY (DIRECTOR)
- JAMES MILLER (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To raise money from friends, family and the general public to be used to support the education, health and welfare of children and families in kisoro, uganda.
What it reported doing in 2025
During 2025, the kisoro children's foundation raised money to support projects in kisoro uganda. We provided funds for 1) capital improvements and an additional building for the ineza children's centre; 2) for the purchase of farmland to grow food for the ineza parents' school; 3) for computers for ineza children's centre; 4) for disposable diapers for two hospitals and a baby home in kisoro; 5) for sanitary supplies for a girls's school in kisoro; 6) for shipping of infant clothing for a public hospital in kisoro; 7) for scholarships to ineza parents' school; and 8) for scholarships for young girls and women in secondary and post graduate schools.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $174K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.