Kirby Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 370661215
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Monticello, IL, US
- Phone
- 217-762-2115
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,027,435
- Expenses
- $83,976,584
- Assets
- $163,964,494
- Liabilities
- $43,130,985
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN TENHOUSE (SECRETARY OF THE BOARD/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN TENHOUSE (SECRETARY OF THE BOARD/CEO): $591,548 total reported compensation
- DR NARAIN MANDHAN (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER (THRU 8/24)): $462,202 total reported compensation
- DR BRIAN YOCKS (PHYSICIAN): $413,570 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health and well-being of the communities we serve by providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare services.
What it reported doing in 2024
The hospital provides quality inpatient and outpatient services to its community. Free, subsidized, and government assisted care are provided at a reduced rate when needed. Services provided during the year include approximately 107,298 patient visits through the kirby medical clinic, 2,152 nursing care inpatient days, and 126,594 laboratory procedures. Services include, but are not limited to, 24-hour emergency healthcare, ambulance service, bone health, cardiac rehabilitation, colonoscopy, cosmetic surgery, ct scanning, diagnostic imaging, digital mammography, general and specialty surgeries, family medicine, mental health counseling, mri, nuclear medicine, occupational therapy, oncology clinic, orthopedics, patient centered medical home, pet/ct, physical therapy, primary care doctors, and pulmonary rehabilitation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.1%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.95; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 67% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $64.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $592K · 21 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.7M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.