Kipp South Fulton Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
134228794
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
East Point, GA, USA
Phone
6782780160
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Charter Schools

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,483,884
Expenses
$3,725,299
Assets
$3,939,496
Liabilities
$142,361

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of kipp south fulton academy, inc. Is to equip students with the academic skills, scholarly habits, and character traits necessary to be successful in top quality colleges and the competitive world beyond.

What it reported doing in 2012

See full description on sch o.kipp south fulton academy (ksfa), a public charter school authorized by fulton county schools, opened its doors to 75 fifth graders in july 2003. Ksfa has grown by one grade level per year and reached full growth in july 2006, with approximately 320 students in grades five through eight. The mission of ksfa is to strengthen the knowledge, skills, character, and physical fitness of students in south fulton county, thereby creating opportunities for success in top-notch high schools, colleges, and the competitive world beyond the classroom. Using the nationally-proven kipp model as a foundation for the school program, ksfa serves college-bound students from throughout the fulton county schools with a specific focus on east Washington and the communities that comprise south fulton county. The school is located in the historic east point elementary school. Ksfa is realizing its mission through a number of organizational and academic innovations that have enabled kipp schools nationwide to close the achievement gap. Through rigorous curriculum, implementation of instructional best practices, and intensive support for each student, ksfa has provided the students and families of south fulton county with a college-preparatory program that supports each student, regardless of skills and experience upon enrollment, as they go to and through college. Academic innovations that have enabled ksfa to meet its rigorous goals over the prior charter term are built on the kipp five pillars, which characterize all kipp schools nation-wide: (1) high expectations, (2) choice & commitment, (3) more time, (4) power to lead, and (5) focus on results. In addition to the five pillars, ksfa's school-specific values shape the school's culture and environment by stoking the fire within each ksfa student and staff member. The expectation is not only that ksfa students will internalize the four core values, but that all stakeholders (including parents, teachers, staff, board and community members) will keep their fires burning as well. The fire is integrated throughout the code of conduct, character education, school-wide celebrations, parent workshops, and community service that are a regular part of the ksfa program. - family and friendship: treating all persons with kindness and respect - integrity: doing the right thing no matter where a student may be or who is watching him/her - responsibility: following through on all of tasks and commitments - excellence: giving 100% effort in everything that students do

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.