Kiowa Creek Community Church Nonprofit Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841605760
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Kiowa, CO, USA
Phone
3036212376
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,016
Expenses
$107,016
Assets
$314,391
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Saltzman (Trustee, President)
  • Linda Ehman (Trustee, Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • David Saltzman (Trustee, President)
  • Linda Ehman (Trustee, Vice President)
  • Carla Martell (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Religious organization. Church and foodbank. Our church is a small church established in 1907. We have a foodbank serving Elbert County residents that has been in operation for over 30 years.

What it reported doing in 2023

Religious organization. Church and foodbank. Our church is a small church established in 1907. We have a foodbank serving Elbert County residents that has been in operation for over 30 years. We serve an average of 45 families per week

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.7%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.94; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -63.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.7% of revenue deployed · 4.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.