Kinisi Movement Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993861053
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Campbell, CA, USA
Phone
4155331680
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$101,276
Expenses
$1,193
Assets
$100,083

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Faisal Mirza (President CEO Director)

People named in this filing

  • Faisal Mirza (President CEO Director)
  • Rajveen Sendher (Secretary CFO Director)
  • Avtar Sendher (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance human health through grants and research aimed at reducing the risk of musculoskeletal joint injuries and joint degeneration through non-pharmacological non-medical-implant-based initiatives making restoration of human mobility accessible and balanced across all demographics.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organizational Formation and Mission Development: During its short initial tax year of July 5 through October 31 2024 the organization completed IRS 501c3 recognition established governance structures and conducted foundational planning for its charitable mission. Activities included literature review regarding the need for non-pharmacological approaches to joint health and arthritis prevention discussions with prospective donors regarding funding priorities for joint health research and public education establishment of banking and accounting infrastructure website launch following receipt of IRS determination letter on July 17 2024 and receipt of an initial 100,000 restricted grant from Wintercreek Foundation for knee injury prevention arthritis and mobility improvement research. No grants were made and no research was conducted during this short initial period.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.2%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.8%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 83.89; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.