Kingston Foundation for Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465396690
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kingston, MA, USA
Phone
5082779564
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$132,778
Expenses
$131,005
Assets
$22,682

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALLISON BROWN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ALLISON BROWN (PRESIDENT)
  • CAITLIN SULLIVAN (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SAMANTHA GIFFORD (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help community members channel their positive energy into improving the already phenomenal public school system here in Kingston.

What it reported doing in 2025

The foundation operates to support and enhance educational opportunities within the local public school system. During the year, the foundation provided financial and in-kind support to the school system, including direct funding for classrooms, educational programs, and instructional initiatives benefiting teachers and students. In addition, the foundation purchased and donated educational software, technology, and other instructional resources for use across classrooms and within the school district. The organization also made direct contributions to the school district to support academic programs, curriculum enhancement, and student learning initiatives. Through these efforts, the foundation continued its mission of strengthening public education by supporting educators, enhancing instructional resources, and improving student outcomes across the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 55.8%; rating input score 56

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 55% of revenue deployed · 55.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.