Kings View-Cabrini Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942697297
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Atwater, CA, USA
Phone
2098124501
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Group Homes

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leon Hoover (CEO Partial Yr)
  • Amanda Nugent Divine (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Philip Neufeld MBA (Chairperson)
  • David Singh (Vice Chairperso)
  • E Jane Middleton DSW (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Kings View Cabrini Center, Inc. provides housing for: women and children with very low incomes who are participating in drug and alcohol recovery programs, and for adults with mental illness.

What it reported doing in 2019

Kings View-Cabrini Center, Inc. formerly held and operated a shelter home for women in addiction recovery and their children (benefitting approximately 25 persons annually, while in operation). On July 23, 2015, all Cabrini assets that were held for sale at June 30, 2015 were sold for $260,000. The mortgage payable relating to the assets held for sale was subsequently paid-off with the proceeds from the sale. As a result of selling operating assets, Cabrini transferred all remaining assets to Kings View Corporation as of 3/31/2019. However, the process of formal dissolution with the Secretary of State of California was not completed until 1/29/2020. The Attorney Generals Office of California declared formal dissolution as of 2/24/2020. Therefore the State process for dissolution is now complete, and this is the final return.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -50% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 1 of 1 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.