Kingdom International Economic Development Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061303407
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- East Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8602666391
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $155,193
- Expenses
- $114,974
- Assets
- $175,557
- Liabilities
- $135,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Metashar Dillon (CEO)
- Andrea Jeffress (Vice President - Strategic Alliance)
People named in this filing
- Metashar Dillon (CEO)
- Wesley Dillon (Business Development)
- Andrea Jeffress (Vice President - Strategic Alliance)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Meeting Needs and Solving Problems for the benefit of all humanity. A community resource for children and families in the areas of food, clothing, skills training for youth entrepreneurs, career development, disaster relief for natural disasters and pandemic response, health disparity through the development of a free children's specialty hospital, and fundraising for college scholarships.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided help to thousands of families by providing food, clothing, and toys. Expanded activities to assist students in obtaining college scholarships through training workshops in the youth humanitarian awards. Provided food to rural communities in Zambia, Africa.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.5%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 53.3%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 53.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 45.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 139.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.5% of revenue deployed · 53.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.