Kingdom Impact Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
884399233
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Florence, KS, USA
Phone
6202865396
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$960,847
Expenses
$55,855
Assets
$2,273,607
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUSSELL ALLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • RUSSELL ALLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ROBERT PANKRATZ (SENIOR DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a setting where lives can be refreshed and restored to display gods splendor

What it reported doing in 2025

Kingdom impact , a christ centered retreat center, non-denominational church and ranch, provides a setting where lives are being restored and refreshed so christ can be displayed to the nations. Our ministry reaches locally, nationally, and globally. The retreat center hosts church and mission organizations providing valuable orientation, training and debriefing to young people going out on short-term mission trips or as full time missionaries. Churches and christian colleges bring staff, leadership teams or sports teams for team building, strategy planning and game playing. Families find a peaceful and fun setting for reunions. Businesses gather for meetings. Rodeo queens and announcers find lodging and a chance to gather around a campfire during the local rodeo. In the heart of the prairie, people gather from around the midwest at the vision 20 20 summit conference to explore how god is calling them to do more. Individuals or couples stay in the prayer cabin for a time of prayer, soothing rest and restoration. The retreate center bustles with activity over 150 days

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 95
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.8%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 94.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 40.71; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 41.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 62.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.8% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.