Kingdom Conditioning Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421532627
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, US
- Phone
- 4088289104
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $352,610
- Expenses
- $294,055
- Assets
- $56,651
- Liabilities
- $61,744
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ron Kardashian (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Ron Kardashian (President): $237,414 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Through mentorship and coaching programs, leadership development training, and speaking engagements at churches, organizations, and ministries worldwide, we equip the fivefold ministry with deep performance behaviors that align with the Mind of Christ as revealed through the Holy Scriptures. We provide fresh water wells in impoverished nations, bridging the natural and the spiritual by introducing the Living Water of the Gospel alongside clean water to strengthen ground-level missionary work. We equip leaders with the biological framework outlined in Scripture to live healthy lives that produce healthy communities, churches, and businesses. We equip heads of organizations and nations with biblical executive mentorship and coaching that removes the liabilities limiting influence and growth, establishing healthy, Kingdom-governed infrastructure.
What it reported doing in 2024
Established in 2002, KCM operates as a 501(c) non-profit organization and has reached over 50 nations. We exist to serve the churches, their leadership, organizations and individuals by empowering them to connect with their God-given potential and purpose. We create educational forums, mentorship and tools to empower them to increase their economic, political, social, educational, gender, and spiritual strength in their lives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.6%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.09; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 62.6% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $221K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $237K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.